Applicant Fails To Provide Diagnosis That Would Remove Her From MIG - Applicant and Aviva Insurance Canada LAT 17-001007 2018 CanLII 2309

April 11, 2018, Kitchener, Ontario

Posted by: Robert Deutschmann, Personal Injury Lawyer

Applicant and Aviva Insurance Canada LAT 17-001007 2018 CanLII 2309

Date of Decision: January 18, 2018
Heard Before: Adjudicator Robert Watt

MIG: applicant fails to show any diagnosed pre-existing injury that would remove her from the MIG; applicant fails to provide diagnosis of any injury that removes her from the MIG

The applicant was hurt in a car crash on April 22, 2015 and sought benefits from Aviva pursuant to the SABS. When Aviva refused to pay for certain benefits and the applicant applied to the LAT for arbitration.


  1. Are the applicant’s injuries predominantly minor injuries as defined in the Schedule?
  2. Is the applicant entitled to a medical benefit in the amount of $3,132.36 for chiropractic submitted on June 11, 2015?
  3. Is the applicant entitled to a medical benefit in the amount of $2,968.64 for chiropractic treatment submitted on October 1, 2015?
  4. Is the applicant entitled to interest on the overdue payment of benefits?


  1. The applicant’s accident-related injuries fall within the MIG.
  2. The applicant is not entitled to medical benefits in the amounts of $3,132.36 and $2,968.64, for chiropractic treatments.

The SABS defines a minor injury to include sprain strain, whiplash associated disorder, contusion, abrasion, laceration or subluxation and includes any clinically associated sequelae to such an injury. Treatment for any minor injury impairment is limited to $3500.00.

The onus is on the insured to prove, on a balance of probabilities that the MIG does not apply. Treatment plans must be reasonable and necessary.

The applicant was in a T-bone collision on April 22, 2015. She had to be extricated from her car, and was taken to the hospital by ambulance. She complained of left neck pain, shoulder pain, mild left arm numbness and a headache. Both the ambulance report and the hospital emergency report indicated there was some neck and shoulder pain complained of, but nothing more serious.

The applicant relies on two reports as the basis of her removal from the MIG. The reports indicate that the applicant has a pre –accident sciatic nerve problem, suffers from anxiety since the accident, has chronic post traumatic headache, and she cannot function at full capacity. The noting of the applicant’s pre-accident sciatic nerve problem was not based on the doctor’s direct expertise or during his care pre-accident.

Aviva submits that the applicant’s injuries fall within the MIG. Aviva relies on the insurer’s examination which conclude that the applicant suffered minor injuries.

CNRs from the applicant’s family doctor indicate that that the applicant went on a camping trip, travelled to Nova Scotia around August/ September 2015, and also flew to Jamaica in December 2016. The family doctor saw the applicant over 15 times for issues other than myofascial pain after the accident.

Upon review of the evidence the Adjudicator found that the applicant has not presented any pre-accident medical evidence by a health practitioner to show a pre-existing medical condition. The applicant had kidney disease/sciatic nerve/hypertension/overweight, but there is no evidence that they prevent maximal recovery under the MIG.

On this basis the applicant has failed to prove any impairment sustained from the accident that would take her outside of the MIG, or that she had pre-existing medical conditions that would prevent maximal recovery under the MIG.


Posted under Accident Benefit News, Automobile Accident Benefits, Car Accidents, LAT Case, LAT Decisions, Minor Injury Guidelines, Personal Injury, Treatment

View All Posts

About Deutschmann Law

Deutschmann Law serves South-Western Ontario with offices in Kitchener-Waterloo, Cambridge, Woodstock, Brantford, Stratford and Ayr. The law practice of Robert Deutschmann focuses almost exclusively in personal injury and disability insurance matters. For more information, please visit or call us toll-free at 1-866-414-4878.

It is important that you review your accident benefit file with one of our experienced personal injury / car accident lawyers to ensure that you obtain access to all your benefits which include, but are limited to, things like physiotherapy, income replacement benefits, vocational retraining and home modifications.

Practice Areas

  1. Car accidents
  2. Motorcycle accidents
  3. Automobile accident benefits
  4. Catastrophic injury
  5. Brain injury
  6. Paraplegia and Quadriplegia
  7. Spinal cord injury
  8. Drunk driving accidents
  9. Concussion syndrome
  1. Wrongful death
  2. Bicycle accidents
  3. Disability insurance claims
  4. Slip and fall injury
  5. Fractures or broken bone injury
  6. Pedestrian accidents
  7. Chronic pain
  8. Truck accidents
  9. Amputation and disfigurement

Personal Injury Blog

Apr 20, 2018
Applicant Fails to Present Medical Evidence of Pre-existing Neuropsychological Condition - Applicant and Certas LAT 17-001228 2018 CanLII 8098
Apr 19, 2018
Supreme Court Rules There is No Duty of Care Owed to Thieves and Trespassers to Inhibit Theft
Apr 19, 2018
Were injuries caused by this accident? Applicant and TD LAT 17-003356 2018 CanLII 8082
Apr 18, 2018
Applicant Entitled to Some Treatment Plans and Medical Expenses But Fails to Make Case for Rest - KA and Aviva LAT 17-002023 2018 CanLII 8086
Apr 17, 2018
Man sues 10 year child when he runs into her bicycle
Apr 17, 2018
Appeal Fails as Tribunal Error is Inconsequential to Decision - DW v. The Co-operators, LAT 17-000388 2018 CanLII 8092

More Personal Injury Articles » 
Review our services

Connect with us

Facebook Twitter Linkedin Youtube Google