Were the CAT impairments due to the accident and were costs ‘incurred’ - Pucci v. Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Company, 2019 ONSC 1706

May 11, 2019, Kitchener, Ontario

Posted by: Robert Deutschmann, Personal Injury Lawyer

Were the CAT impairments due to the accident and were costs ‘incurred’  - Pucci v. Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Company, 2019 ONSC 1706

Date of Decision: March 15, 2019
Heard Before: Madam Justice H.M. Pierce

ENTITLEMENT TO BENEFITS - was applicant CAT impaired due to car accident; is applicant entitled to CAT benefits; did insurer unreasonably withhold benefits; did insurer take unreasonably long to deliver CAT assessment; applicant makes case for CAT impairment

Ms. Pucci was in a car accident in June 2013 in Thunder Bay. She sought a declaration of CAT impairment due to a mental or behavioral disorder and continued entitlement to IRBs after the Post 104-week mark of the accident. Wawanesa paid the non-catastrophic limits but denied that Ms. Pucci suffered a CAT impairment as defined by the SABS. Ms. Pucci has a history of illness and anxiety and depression.

Wawanesa did not initially contest the causation of the injuries as they had paid the non-catastrophic benefits under the policy but went on to challenge the causation for the first time when Ms. Pucci applied for CAT benefits. While Wawanesa’s experts concluded that Ms. Pucci suffered a marked impairment in all four domains of functioning they argue that the impairments are not a result of the car accident.

At issue in the trial was whether Ms. Pucci was CAT impaired as a direct result of the accident, and if so did Wawanesa deny or withhold the benefits unreasonably. Ms. Pucci and Wawanesa agreed at the beginning of trial that if Ms. Pucci was CAT impaired due to the accident then Ms. Pucci meets the test for Post 104 IRB.

Ms. Pucci was entirely successful at trial. The Honourable Justice Pierce, held that

  1. Ms. Pucci is CAT impaired
  2. Ms. Pucci was entitled to IRBs as a result of the CAT finding
  3. Ms. Pucci is entitled to housekeeping and home maintenance benefits
  4. Ms. Pucci is entitled to ACB of $6,000 month

Justice Pierce also found that Wawanesa unreasonably withheld/denied benefits. Her Honour notably stated that the 9 months Wawanesa took to deliver its CAT reports was excessive. The trial judge found that in this case taking 9 months to deliver CAT reports all while expecting Ms. Pucci to fund her own care during that time was unjust.

Justice Pierce was particularly clear in her decision with respect to the rejection of Wawnesa’s definition of “incurred” and Wawanesa’s unreasonable withholding of benefits,

Justice Pierce stated at para 108 of her decision

“… such an interpretation would encourage insurers to delay payments to insured in order to make the argument that expenses covered by a policy had not actually been incurred. Justice Pierce exercised her discretion under subsection (3)(8) of the SABS, as they then were, and held that Wawanesa had unreasonably denied Ms. Pucci’s benefits and deemed all outstanding expenses to have been incurred, even though it was agreed that Ms. Pucci had not actually incurred all of the expenses claimed.

Ms. Pucci also submitted that Wawanesa’s argument on causation should be Estopped by conduct, and that Wawanesa had waived it’s right to dispute causation. However, because Her Honour found that Ms. Pucci met the “but for” test, it was unnecessary to consider the arguments of Estoppel and Waiver.  

Wawanesa appealed the “unreasonable delay” provision. You can read the full decision here.

Posted under Accident Benefit News, Attendant Care Benefits, Automobile Accident Benefits, Car Accidents, Catastrophic Injury, Income Replacement Benefits, Personal Injury

View All Posts

About Deutschmann Law

Deutschmann Law serves South-Western Ontario with offices in Kitchener-Waterloo, Cambridge, Woodstock, Brantford, Stratford and Ayr. The law practice of Robert Deutschmann focuses almost exclusively in personal injury and disability insurance matters. For more information, please visit www.deutschmannlaw.com or call us toll-free at 1-866-414-4878.

It is important that you review your accident benefit file with one of our experienced personal injury / car accident lawyers to ensure that you obtain access to all your benefits which include, but are limited to, things like physiotherapy, income replacement benefits, vocational retraining and home modifications.

Practice Areas

  1. Car accidents
  2. Motorcycle accidents
  3. Automobile accident benefits
  4. Catastrophic injury
  5. Brain or Head injury
  6. Paraplegia and Quadriplegia
  7. Spinal cord injury
  8. Drunk driving accidents
  9. Concussion syndrome
  10. Post Traumatic Stress Disorder
  11. Slip and Fall Accidents
  12. Birth Trauma Injury
  1. Wrongful death
  2. Bicycle accidents
  3. Disability insurance claims
  4. Slip and fall injury
  5. Fractures or broken bone injury
  6. Pedestrian accidents
  7. Chronic pain
  8. Truck accidents
  9. Amputation and disfigurement
  10. Fibromyalgia
  11. Nursing Home Fatality Claims

Personal Injury Blog

Jul 27, 2021
IU School of Medicine researchers discover new potential for functional recovery after spinal cord injury
Jul 20, 2021
All Running Limitation Periods are Extended 183 Days Due to COVID-19 but That Doesn't Help This Claimant - McAuley v. Canada Post Corporation, 2021 ONSC 4528
Jul 20, 2021
New and Significant Departure from Previous Upper Limits for Such Damages – Moore v. 7595611 Canada Corp., 2021 ONCA 459
Jul 20, 2021
Brain Injury Can Change Everything – Including Your Marriage
Jul 15, 2021
Motorcycle Deaths At Concerning Levels Again This Year
Jul 13, 2021
New Treatment Protocols May Be Useful for Mild TBI Victims with Chronic Symptoms

More Personal Injury Articles » 
Review our services

Connect with us

Facebook Twitter Linkedin Youtube