MIG and Chronic Pain - Aviva Canada Inc. and Maverick Sleep

January 27, 2019, Kitchener, Ontario

Posted by: Robert Deutschmann, Personal Injury Lawyer

Aviva Canada Inc. and Maverick Sleep

Date of Decision: July 10, 2018
Heard Before: Adjudicator Maggy Murray,


MIG: Does chronic back pain remove respondent from MIG; are chronic pain complaints separate from the minor injury complaint

Under section 283 of the Insurance Act, R.S.O. 1990 it is ordered that:

  1. The appeal of the Arbitrator's Order of May 1, 2017 is allowed in full.  Paragraphs 1 and 2 of the Arbitrator's order are revoked, and the following substituted:
    1. Mr. Sleep’s injuries fall within the Minor Injury Guideline as defined in s. 3(1) of the Schedule;
    2. If the parties are unable to agree on the entitlement to, or quantum of the arbitration expenses of this matter, the parties may request an appointment for determination of them in accordance with Rules 75 to 79 of the Dispute Resolution Practice Code.
  2. Before the appeal, the parties agreed that the successful party to the appeal would be entitled to $5,000.00 inclusive of disbursements and HST.  Mr. Sleep shall pay Aviva Canada Inc. its legal expenses of the appeal proceedings herein, in the amount of $5,000.00, inclusive of disbursements, HST.

Nature of Appeal

Aviva Canada appeals the order of Arbitrator Anschell dated May 1, 2017, wherein she found that Mr. Sleep’s injuries did not fall within the Minor Injury Guideline (MIG) and awarded him expenses of the hearing. For the reasons set out below, the appeal is allowed.


Mr. Sleep was 15 when he was involved in an accident on March 26, 2014.  Mr. Sleep began experiencing back pain within a few days of the accident.  The Arbitrator found Mr. Sleep credible and accepted the opinion of the orthopaedic surgeon that Mr. Sleep developed chronic mechanical problems with regard to his back.  The Arbitrator concluded that “Mr. Sleep's ongoing sharp back pain does not constitute a "minor injury" as defined in s. 3(1) of the Schedule. A chronic pain diagnosis a few years post-accident establishes a severity beyond that contemplated by the Minor Injury Guideline.” Consequently, the Arbitrator found that the diagnosis of chronic pain took Mr. Sleep out of the MIG.


Aviva’s primary ground of appeal is that Mr. Sleep’s injuries fall within the MIG. A minor injury is defined in s. 3(1) of the Schedule as one or more of a:  “sprain, strain, whiplash associated disorder, contusion, abrasion …, and includes any clinically associated sequelae to such an injury.” Sequelae is defined as:  “an aftereffect of a disease, condition, or injury; a secondary result.”

Section 18(1) of the Schedule provides that if a claimant’s injuries fall within s. 3(1) of the Schedule and are “predominantly a minor injury,” the claimant can only receive up to $3,500 for their medical treatment. 

Therefore, an Arbitrator must first consider a claimant’s injuries and determine whether they are within the MIG.  If the injuries are within the MIG, an Arbitrator must then consider whether the claimant’s injuries are a “clinically associated sequelae” of a claimant’s minor injury.  In Mr. Sleep’s case, the Arbitrator did not analyze whether Mr. Sleep’s complaints of chronic pain were separate from the minor injury complaints, and that is an error of law.

Posted under Accident Benefit News, Chronic Pain, FSCO, Minor Injury Guidelines

View All Posts

About Deutschmann Law

Deutschmann Law serves South-Western Ontario with offices in Kitchener-Waterloo, Cambridge, Woodstock, Brantford, Stratford and Ayr. The law practice of Robert Deutschmann focuses almost exclusively in personal injury and disability insurance matters. For more information, please visit www.deutschmannlaw.com or call us toll-free at 1-866-414-4878.

It is important that you review your accident benefit file with one of our experienced personal injury / car accident lawyers to ensure that you obtain access to all your benefits which include, but are limited to, things like physiotherapy, income replacement benefits, vocational retraining and home modifications.

Practice Areas

  1. Car accidents
  2. Motorcycle accidents
  3. Automobile accident benefits
  4. Catastrophic injury
  5. Brain or Head injury
  6. Paraplegia and Quadriplegia
  7. Spinal cord injury
  8. Drunk driving accidents
  9. Concussion syndrome
  10. Post Traumatic Stress Disorder
  11. Slip and Fall Accidents
  12. Birth Trauma Injury
  1. Wrongful death
  2. Bicycle accidents
  3. Disability insurance claims
  4. Slip and fall injury
  5. Fractures or broken bone injury
  6. Pedestrian accidents
  7. Chronic pain
  8. Truck accidents
  9. Amputation and disfigurement
  10. Fibromyalgia
  11. Nursing Home Fatality Claims

Personal Injury Blog

Aug 18, 2022
Fleet of AVs Approved for Use in California
Aug 16, 2022
E-bikes – The Crashes Are More Frequent and More Serious than Traditional Bikes
Aug 11, 2022
Are you ready to provide unpaid care in the event a family member is seriously injured?
Aug 09, 2022
Why Don’t Woodpeckers suffer TBI?
Aug 04, 2022
New Research to Examine if Psilocybin is Effective in the Treatment of Depression
Aug 02, 2022
New Treatment for Pain Offers Hope to Chronic Pain Sufferers

More Personal Injury Articles » 
Review our services

Connect with us

Facebook Twitter Linkedin Youtube