Applicant Suffers Chronic Pain and Falls Outside MIG - FH and Certas Direct Insurance Company, 2018 CanLII 39445 (ON LAT 17-003735 )

June 16, 2018, Kitchener, Ontario

Posted by: Robert Deutschmann, Personal Injury Lawyer

FH and Certas Direct Insurance Company, 2018 CanLII 39445 (ON LAT 17-003735 )

Date: March 8, 2018
Heard Before: Adjudicator Chris Sewrattan

MIG and MEDICAL BENEFITS: applicant claims benefits outside MIG; applicant makes case she suffers from chronic pain


FH was injured in a car accident on August 11, 2015 and sought payment for SABs from Certas who denied payment for a number of the benefits because it believes that FH should be treated within the MIG. FH appeals for payment to the LAT.

Issues:

 

  1. Are FH’s injuries subject to treatment within the MIG?
  2. Is FH entitled to receive a medical benefit in the amount of $194.03 for physiotherapy treatment pursuant to a Treatment and Assessment Plan submitted on December 2, 2015?
  3. Is FH entitled to receive a medical benefit in the amount of $2,075.48 for physiotherapy treatment pursuant to a Treatment and Assessment Plan submitted on February 11, 2016?
  4. Is FH entitled to the cost of examination in the amount of $2,200.00 for psychological assessment pursuant to a Treatment and Assessment Plan submitted on April 26, 2016?
  5. Is FH entitled to receive a medical benefit in the amount of $2,075.48 for physiotherapy treatment pursuant to a Treatment and Assessment Plan submitted on June 10, 2016?
  6. Is FH entitled to the cost of examination in the amount of $2,200.00 for chronic pain assessment pursuant to a Treatment and Assessment Plan submitted on June 24, 2016?
  7. Is FH entitled to receive a medical benefit in the amount of $1,762.90 for physiotherapy treatment pursuant to a Treatment and Assessment Plan submitted on November 8, 2016?
  8. Is FH entitled to an award for unreasonably withheld or delayed payments under Regulation 664?
  9. Is FH entitled to interest on any overdue payment of benefits?
  10. Is FH entitled to costs under Rule 19?

Result:

  1. FH suffers from Chronic Post Traumatic Pain Syndrome, an injury that is not predominantly minor. As a result, FH is not subject to the MIG.
  2. FH entitled to each of the Treatment Plans in dispute. FH has proven that they are reasonable and necessary. FH is entitled to interest in accordance with s. 51 of the Schedule.
  3. FH is not entitled to an award under s. 10 of Regulation 664 because Certas’ decision to confine his treatment to the MIG was not unreasonable.
  4. FH is not entitled to costs under Rule 19 because the conduct about which she complains occurred outside of the Tribunal’s proceeding.

Discussion:

The Adjudicatro reviewed the totality of the medical evidence and determined that she has proven on a balance of probabilities that as a result of the accident she suffers from Chronic Post Traumatic Pain Syndrome, and that this impairment is the product on an injury that is not predominantly minor. As a result, FH is not subject to the MIG.

The MIG is significant because it has a payment limit of $3,500. That applicant has already reached that limit. If FH is subject to the MIG, she will not be entitled to payment for any of the disputed benefits.

FH has proven that she suffers from Chronic Post Traumatic Pain Syndrome, and that this impairment is the product on an injury that is not predominantly minor. FH is not subject to the MIG

 

 

Posted under Accident Benefit News, Automobile Accident Benefits, Car Accidents, Chronic Pain, LAT Decisions, Minor Injury Guidelines

View All Posts

About Deutschmann Law

Deutschmann Law serves South-Western Ontario with offices in Kitchener-Waterloo, Cambridge, Woodstock, Brantford, Stratford and Ayr. The law practice of Robert Deutschmann focuses almost exclusively in personal injury and disability insurance matters. For more information, please visit www.deutschmannlaw.com or call us toll-free at 1-866-414-4878.

It is important that you review your accident benefit file with one of our experienced personal injury / car accident lawyers to ensure that you obtain access to all your benefits which include, but are limited to, things like physiotherapy, income replacement benefits, vocational retraining and home modifications.

Practice Areas

  1. Car accidents
  2. Motorcycle accidents
  3. Automobile accident benefits
  4. Catastrophic injury
  5. Brain or Head injury
  6. Paraplegia and Quadriplegia
  7. Spinal cord injury
  8. Drunk driving accidents
  9. Concussion syndrome
  10. Post Traumatic Stress Disorder
  11. Slip and Fall Accidents
  12. Birth Trauma Injury
  1. Wrongful death
  2. Bicycle accidents
  3. Disability insurance claims
  4. Slip and fall injury
  5. Fractures or broken bone injury
  6. Pedestrian accidents
  7. Chronic pain
  8. Truck accidents
  9. Amputation and disfigurement
  10. Fibromyalgia
  11. Nursing Home Fatality Claims

Personal Injury Blog

Nov 26, 2020
Caring for Your Bike in Winter
Nov 24, 2020
Do Juries Have Capacity to Understand Concept of Chronic Pain - Ismail v. Fleming, 2018 ONSC 6780 (CanLII)
Nov 24, 2020
Winter Cycling in Ontario
Nov 19, 2020
The Pandemic Has Seen Many People Struggle to Get Timely Physical Therapy and Mental Health Care
Nov 17, 2020
Telehealth Use has Risen Dramatically Since the Onset of COVID-19
Nov 13, 2020
Is it time for a new helmet? This year the answer is yes!

More Personal Injury Articles » 
Review our services

Connect with us

Facebook Twitter Linkedin Youtube