COVID-19 UPDATE  

Applicant shows treatment plans are reasonable and necessary - Applicant v travelers LAT 16-003313

January 24, 2018, Kitchener, Ontario

Posted by: Robert Deutschmann, Personal Injury Lawyer

Applicant v Travelers LAT 16-003313

Decision Date: December 8, 2017
Heard Before: Adjudicator Paul Gosio

ENTITLEMENT TO BENEFITS: treatments are reasonable and necessary


The applicant was injured in a CAR accident on June 30, 2016.  She was the front-seated passenger in a vehicle that rear-ended the car ahead of her while travelling on the highway. The windshield shattered and fragments of glass penetrated the left side of her face, wrist and arm.  She was transported to Sunnybrook Hospital.  She sustained the following injuries as a result of the motor vehicle accident: left wrist and thumb fracture; bilateral corneal abrasions; pain in her neck, back, abdomen, left shoulder, and right leg.

The applicant sought benefits pursuant to the SABs.  She submitted a Treatment and Assessment Plan dated August 5, 2016, in the amount of $3,811.27 for occupational therapy and assistive devices and a Treatment and Assessment Plan dated September 7, 2016, in the amount of $3,296.02 for assistive devices, which included an orthopaedic memory foam mattress.  Both treatment plans were recommended by an occupational therapist. 

On November 8, 2016, Travelers conducted an in-home occupational therapy assessment in order to determine if the treatment plans were reasonable and necessary.  The respondent partially approved the August 5, 2016 Treatment Plan in the amount of $1,856.19.  The partial denial was based on the lack of evidence relating the proposed goods and services to the subject accident.  The September 7, 2016 Treatment Plan was denied in its entirety for the same reason.

The applicant applied to the LAT.

Issue

  1. The applicant seeks a determination from the LAT that the treatment plans in dispute are reasonable and necessary pursuant to s. 14 and s. 15 of the Schedule.

Result

  1. The applicant has met her onus of establishing on a balance of probabilities that she is entitled to the unapproved portion of the Treatment and Assessment Plan dated August 5, 2017, and the Treatment and Assessment Plan dated September 7, 2016, are reasonable and necessary.

Section 14 and 15 of the Schedule provides that an insurer is only liable to pay for medical expenses that are reasonable and necessary.  The applicant bears the onus of proving on a balance of probabilities that the treatment plan is reasonable and necessary.

The Arbitrator reviewed the evidence and the law. Based on the medical evidence of the injuries and the results of the assessments the Arbitrator determined that the benefits applied for are reasonable and necessary.

Posted under Accident Benefit News, Automobile Accident Benefits, Car Accidents, Fractures, LAT Case, LAT Decisions, Personal Injury, Physical Therapy, Treatment

View All Posts

About Deutschmann Law

Deutschmann Law serves South-Western Ontario with offices in Kitchener-Waterloo, Cambridge, Woodstock, Brantford, Stratford and Ayr. The law practice of Robert Deutschmann focuses almost exclusively in personal injury and disability insurance matters. For more information, please visit www.deutschmannlaw.com or call us toll-free at 1-866-414-4878.

It is important that you review your accident benefit file with one of our experienced personal injury / car accident lawyers to ensure that you obtain access to all your benefits which include, but are limited to, things like physiotherapy, income replacement benefits, vocational retraining and home modifications.

Practice Areas

  1. Car accidents
  2. Motorcycle accidents
  3. Automobile accident benefits
  4. Catastrophic injury
  5. Brain or Head injury
  6. Paraplegia and Quadriplegia
  7. Spinal cord injury
  8. Drunk driving accidents
  9. Concussion syndrome
  10. Post Traumatic Stress Disorder
  11. Business Interruption Insurance
  12. Birth Trauma Injury
  1. Wrongful death
  2. Bicycle accidents
  3. Disability insurance claims
  4. Slip and fall injury
  5. Fractures or broken bone injury
  6. Pedestrian accidents
  7. Chronic pain
  8. Truck accidents
  9. Amputation and disfigurement
  10. Fibromyalgia
  11. Nursing Home Fatality Claims

Personal Injury Blog

Jul 02, 2020
Have you been hurt in a cycling accident? Did a car hit you or cause you to fall? You may be eligible for compensation.
Jun 30, 2020
81% of COVID-19 deaths in Canada were in long-term care – nearly double OECD average
Jun 25, 2020
Concepts of Legal Liability and Responsibility Have Not Adequately Kept Pace With Technological Advances
Jun 23, 2020
Ontario Government Agrees Drivers Should Get Auto Insurance Rebates According to Internal Memo
Jun 18, 2020
It’s no cup of tea – but spilling hot tea in the car is not considered a car accident in this case - M.P. v Allstate Insurance Company of Canada, 2020 CanLII 30398 (ON LAT)
Jun 18, 2020
Two recent child drownings highlight importance of water safety

More Personal Injury Articles » 
Review our services

Connect with us

Facebook Twitter Linkedin Youtube Google