| Release Date |
Title |
| Jul 25, 2010 |
|
| Jul 17, 2010 |
| Limitation Defence did not apply to Catastrophic Determination |
| Ramalingam and State Farm Mutual Catastrophic impairment no limitation defence for insurer to CAT determination, particularly where no proper denial provided by insurer insurer cannot issue denial for benefit that has not been explicitly claimed by insured. |
|
| Jun 26, 2010 |
| Arbitrator erred in not assessing all impariments for CAT assessment |
| Bains and RBC General Insurance CAT DESIGNATION appeal of decision finding insured not CAT errors by arbitrator should have considered ratings for other physical impairments even though not stabilized, sleep disorder and chronic pain sent back for another CAT determination hearing. |
|
| Jun 10, 2010 |
| Denial of Income Replacement Benefits |
| C.C. and Economical Mutual Insurance DENIAL OF INCOME REPLACEMENT BENEFITS injuries the result of an accident - insured failed to establish that accident caused or exacerbated current condition considering pre accident medical condition.
|
|
| May 20, 2010 |
| Was Treatment Plan Reasonable and Necessary? |
| L and State Farm Mutual was treatment plan REASONABLE AND NECESSARY interpretation could change in the context in this case the insured had been receiving treatment at approximately the same level before the accident as after no process to review treatment - negative comments regarding operation of IME IME placed emphasis on generating reports quickly |
|
| May 18, 2010 |
| Income Replacement Benefits |
| Passarello and Wawanesa Mutual Insurance SELF EMPLOYMENT Post 104 week test complete inability insured unable to work to the same level in the real world
|
|
| May 17, 2010 |
|
| May 10, 2010 |
| Transition Rules for the New SABs |
| Transition rules for the New SABs coming September 1, 2010, have been released by the Financial Services Commission of Ontario. Many benefits continue for "old" accidents but the assessment cost changes will apply to all. |
|
| May 01, 2010 |
|
| Apr 29, 2010 |
| FSCO Bulletin - Transition Rules for new SABs |
| The Financial Services Commission of Ontario has just released a bulletin outlining the transition rules governing statutory accident benefits applicable to "old accidents" that occur prior to September 1, 2010 and "new accidents" that occur on or after September 1, 2010. |
|
| Apr 28, 2010 |
| Determining Catastrophic Impairment |
| A detailed response from Dr. Brian Levitt and Dr. Ron Kaplan regarding the current state of Catastrophic determination under the SABs. There is clarity and consistency in the process. |
|
| Apr 27, 2010 |
| Payment of Third Party Services |
| MedCentra Inc. v Economical Mutual Insurance PAYMENT OF THIRD PARTY SERVICES - a third party service provider does not have a right to bring an action against an insurer for payment of MRI examinations provided to the insured. |
|
| Apr 06, 2010 |
| Assessor Bias in Treatment Plan Assessment |
| Forbes and Royal & SunAlliance ASSESSOR BIAS insured had conflict with occupational therapist insurer entitled to assessor of choice but must act reasonably assessor must maintain professional neutrality |
|
| Apr 06, 2010 |
|
| Apr 06, 2010 |
| Catastrophic Impairment Appeal |
| Aviva and Pastore CATASTROPHIC IMPAIRMENT Appeal Only one Marked impairment in functioning required to find an insured to be Catastrophically impaired.
|
|
| Apr 06, 2010 |
| Marked Impairment - Physical or Psychological |
| Fournie and Coachman Insurance CATASTROPHIC ASSESSMENT insured sustained injuries to left heel and ankle required two crutches and leg brace found to be Catastrophically Impaired under physical impairment and also under psychological one Marked impairment sufficient physical and psychological can be combined
|
|
| Mar 20, 2010 |
|
| Mar 03, 2010 |
|
| Feb 20, 2010 |
|
| Feb 20, 2010 |
| Special Awards for Unreasonable Delays in Payment |
| Shaikh and Aviva Canada SPECIAL AWARD Award could be sought by insured for unreasonable delays in payments by insurer, even where insurer subsequently makes up the delayed payments and there is nothing owing at time of arbitration.
|
|